Leave a Message

Thank you for your message. We will be in touch with you shortly.

Fullerton Ran the Numbers on Five Downtown Lots. Only Some of Them Pencil Out.

August 27, 2026

Most housing studies read like a wish list. A city names some vacant land, some parking lots, maybe a church parcel nobody thought about, and calls it a housing pipeline. Fullerton's planning staff did something more useful. In a staff report first detailed by the Fullerton Observer on August 17, 2026, they ran each candidate site through the same math a private developer would use before writing a check, and the results split the list in half. Some lots work. One doesn't, at least not yet.

If you're comparing Fullerton to Brea, Anaheim, or Buena Park while you plan a move in the next year, that split matters more than the headline number of units. It tells you where new supply is actually headed, and just as clearly, where it isn't.

The Test Was a Hurdle Rate, Not a Wish List

The report, first covered by the Fullerton Observer, grew out of a state grant deadline. Fullerton had to identify realistic sites for future housing before August 30, 2026, as part of the Housing Element the council adopted on January 7, 2025, which assigns the city a state-mandated target of 13,209 new units. Staff started with eight properties that weren't already inside the city's Housing Incentive Overlay Zone: city-owned parking lots, two church properties, a Bank of America lot, and a few pieces of vacant land. Each was scored on geometry, zoning context, topography, and parking requirements. Five cleared that first cut and got conceptual site plans.

Then came the real test. Consultants measured each concept against an 8 percent leverage yield, described in the report as the standard threshold for whether a project makes financial sense for most developers. That number is the whole story here. It's the line between a site that a builder will actually finance and a site that stays a parking lot no matter what the zoning allows.

Site Proposed Units Feasibility Yield
118 W. Santa Fe Avenue 60 9.3% to 9.6%
122 N. Pomona Avenue (Transit Center parking structure) 100 8.6% to 8.8%
401 N. Harbor Boulevard (Bank of America lot) 65 7.9% to 8.2%
125 W. Chapman Avenue (city surface lot) 105 7.6% to 8.0%
2200 W. Orangethorpe Avenue (church property) 36 affordable or senior units Not yield-tested

Three of the four market-rate sites clear the 8 percent bar. One doesn't. The Chapman Avenue lot, despite being the largest proposed project on the list at 105 units, would need an 11 to 26 percent reduction in land value across the affordability scenarios tested before a developer would touch it.

Why the Church Lot and the Bank Lot Both Beat the City's Own Parking Lot

Here's the part that should reshape how you think about "available land" in any city, not just Fullerton. Zoning didn't decide which sites work. Land basis did. Santa Fe Avenue, a smaller site closer to the train station, cleared the hurdle with room to spare. Chapman Avenue, a bigger city-owned lot, came in short and needs the city to eat a real loss on land value to make the math close.

That's a reminder that a lot being publicly owned, centrally located, or zoned for density doesn't automatically make it developable. The unit count, the achievable rents or sale prices in that specific pocket of downtown, and what the land is worth on paper all interact in ways that don't always match intuition. A parking structure at the train station pencils better than a city lot two blocks away, because the numbers behind it are different, not because one location is objectively better.

State law did its part to clear the runway. The plans were drawn using Senate Bill 79, Assembly Bill 2097, Senate Bill 4, and California's density bonus law, all of which reduce regulatory friction for projects like these. But the report is explicit that those laws don't guarantee anything gets built. They just remove some of the obstacles. The leverage yield test is what's left standing between a site and a shovel.

It's also worth being honest about the timeline. Before any of these five sites can move, Fullerton has to go through the Surplus Land Act process: a formal council vote declaring the property surplus, a public Notice of Availability, and good-faith negotiations with qualified entities before the city can even issue a request for proposals. Zoning and environmental review come after that, at separate public hearings. This is a feasibility study, not a groundbreaking.

The Pipeline That's Already Underway

None of this happens in isolation. Downtown Fullerton already has a meaningful amount of housing under construction or entitled, and it draws the same map as the new study: cluster near the train station and the historic core, not the established single-family tracts.

Lennar's Pines at Fullerton, built on the former Sunrise Village site, will deliver 113 homes, split between 49 small-lot detached houses and 64 townhouses, with first home deliveries slated for 2026. Pointe Commons is adding 62 affordable units on Commonwealth Avenue. A 420-unit student housing project with retail is moving forward on East Chapman Avenue. The Fullerton Town Center Apartments will bring 329 units to the corner of Orangethorpe and Lemon Street, with completion targeted for 2027.

The largest piece by far is the Fullerton Transportation Center Specific Plan, a 35-acre framework for a transit-oriented district around the train station that serves close to 3,000 daily commuters on Metrolink's Orange County Line, making it the line's busiest stop. The plan envisions roughly 1,000 residential units alongside retail, office space, and a hotel, built around a form-based code designed specifically for the area's density and pedestrian character.

Every one of these projects sits within a short walk of the station or the historic downtown core. None of them touches the single-family neighborhoods that make up most of Fullerton's housing stock.

What This Means If You're Weighing Fullerton Against a Neighboring City

If a single-family home is what you're after, this pipeline doesn't change your math much. Fullerton's resale market for houses stayed tight through the first half of 2026. Over the three months ending in June, the median sale price came in around $1.0 million, homes were going pending in roughly 35 days on average, and 209 homes sold that month, down from 231 the year before. That's a market with less turnover than it had twelve months ago, not more, and none of the new construction described above adds to the detached-home supply that drives that number.

If you're comparing condo or townhome options, or you're an investor thinking about a small multifamily purchase, the picture is different. Several hundred new rental and for-sale units are already funded and moving toward delivery within a few blocks of each other, with more potentially coming if the newly studied sites clear their remaining approvals. That concentration means anyone buying an attached home downtown in the next two to three years should expect more competing inventory to hit the market than a simple citywide supply count would suggest, even while the detached-home side of town stays as constrained as it's been all year.

The practical takeaway: don't read "Fullerton is adding housing" as one uniform story. It's two different markets moving on two different timelines, and the dividing line runs almost exactly along the boundary of downtown's transit corridor.

A Few Questions Worth Asking Before You Decide

Does this affect the value of an existing single-family home in Fullerton? Not directly. The sites in this study and the projects already under construction are all attached or multifamily product concentrated near downtown and the train station. They don't add to the detached-home inventory that sets pricing in most of the city's residential neighborhoods.

When will the five newly studied sites actually break ground? Not soon. Before any site can move to a developer, the city has to complete the Surplus Land Act process, including a formal surplus declaration and a public negotiation period, followed by separate zoning and environmental review. The report itself frames this as identifying pathways, not approving projects.

Is this specific to downtown, or could it show up elsewhere in the city? The current study was scoped to properties outside the existing Housing Incentive Overlay Zone, most of them clustered in and around downtown. Sites within the overlay zone already have a faster path to approval under existing rules, which is part of why the newest development keeps landing in the same few blocks.

If you're trying to figure out what any of this means for a specific address, whether you're pricing a resale condo near the train station or comparing a Fullerton purchase against a similar budget in Brea or Anaheim, that's exactly the kind of question worth walking through with someone who tracks these filings as they happen. Ethan Baik and the BAIKHOME team follow Orange County's development pipeline block by block. Reach out for a free home valuation and a straight answer on how a specific property fits into what's actually coming next.

Work With Us

Our mission is to become the most trusted source of innovative real estate solutions, creating exceptional experience for all we serve.